Comments on: photo therapy http://www.anglofille.com/2006/09/28/photo-therapy/ An American in Bloomsbury Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:02:27 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Anglofille http://www.anglofille.com/2006/09/28/photo-therapy/#comment-1733 Anglofille Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:31:31 +0000 http://www.anglofille.com/2006/09/28/photo-therapy/#comment-1733 thanks so much ladies! you are too good for my ego. ;) thanks so much ladies! you are too good for my ego. ;)

]]> By: caroline http://www.anglofille.com/2006/09/28/photo-therapy/#comment-1730 caroline Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:10:30 +0000 http://www.anglofille.com/2006/09/28/photo-therapy/#comment-1730 i agree with the only use film rule. it accomplishes things that digital never will. i'm fifteen but in these fifteen years of experience i have found only one camera that i care to call my own. the lomography lca- it's never taken a shot that disappointed me! the lighting and mood is always perfect on it! it's as if it nutures and milks the light in the photos for all its worth before i print them. my camera is an artist and a poet!^.^ photography with film is classical, difficult, admirable, has more manipulative techniques, and is infintely more romantic! by the way, i super super super love all the photos you've posted. they give me a sense of paris and i enjoy looking through them. i agree with the only use film rule. it accomplishes things that digital never will. i’m fifteen but in these fifteen years of experience i have found only one camera that i care to call my own. the lomography lca- it’s never taken a shot that disappointed me! the lighting and mood is always perfect on it! it’s as if it nutures and milks the light in the photos for all its worth before i print them. my camera is an artist and a poet!^.^

photography with film is classical, difficult, admirable, has more manipulative techniques, and is infintely more romantic!
by the way, i super super super love all the photos you’ve posted. they give me a sense of paris and i enjoy looking through them.

]]> By: Rebecca http://www.anglofille.com/2006/09/28/photo-therapy/#comment-1725 Rebecca Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:06:26 +0000 http://www.anglofille.com/2006/09/28/photo-therapy/#comment-1725 Honey, I don't know what you're talking about with your pictures. They're beautiful! I especially love the rear view of Notre Dame. I think the buttresses are very beautiful. The picture of Champs Elysees is also very nice. Perhaps you mean the ones that don't make it to your Flickr account though... Anyway, as a confidence booster, the professional photographers for my sister's wedding (who were former photo journalists and took magazine quality photos of the wedding), took over 3,000 photos. They approved 375 for my sister to choose from, and would not allow her to see the rest, stating that they were not up to their standards. This is the beauty of digital. At least you're not wasting loads of 35MM film! Honey, I don’t know what you’re talking about with your pictures. They’re beautiful! I especially love the rear view of Notre Dame. I think the buttresses are very beautiful. The picture of Champs Elysees is also very nice.

Perhaps you mean the ones that don’t make it to your Flickr account though… Anyway, as a confidence booster, the professional photographers for my sister’s wedding (who were former photo journalists and took magazine quality photos of the wedding), took over 3,000 photos. They approved 375 for my sister to choose from, and would not allow her to see the rest, stating that they were not up to their standards.

This is the beauty of digital. At least you’re not wasting loads of 35MM film!

]]>